Insurance Is Becoming a Bigger Part of the Real Estate Story
Real estate investors have always watched the same things.
Location.
Rent.
Interest rates.
Tenant demand.
Those factors still matter. But another cost is becoming much harder to ignore.
Insurance.
For many years, insurance was just another expense on a property budget. Owners could estimate the cost, include it in their plans, and move forward. That process is becoming harder as insurance prices rise and coverage becomes more difficult in some areas.
The change is simple.
A building can still have good tenants and strong demand, but rising insurance costs can reduce the money left after expenses.
That changes how investors look at value.
Why This Is Happening
Insurance companies are dealing with a different environment.
Repair costs are higher. Weather-related losses have increased in some regions. Insurers are also becoming more careful about the properties they choose to cover.
This affects real estate owners in several ways.
Some owners are paying higher premiums. Some are accepting larger deductibles. Others are having a harder time finding the same level of coverage they had before.
The building itself may not have changed.
The market around the building has.
That matters because real estate value depends on the income a property can produce after all costs are paid.
If expenses rise faster than expected, the value of that property can change.
What Many Investors Miss
Insurance is not only about cost.
It is also about location.
Two buildings can look almost identical. They can have similar rents, similar tenants, and similar sizes.
But they may have very different futures because one has higher insurance pressure.
This creates a new divide in real estate.
Some properties may continue producing stable income because their costs remain predictable.
Other properties may face growing pressure because expenses keep moving higher.
The difference may not be obvious when a property is purchased.
It appears over years of ownership.
Three miles under America
Three miles beneath American soil, the temperature hits 374 degrees.
At that depth, heat from the Earth’s core turns water into a force powerful enough to spin turbines around the clock - no fuel, no emissions, no off switch.
The International Energy Agency says this resource is 140 times larger than global electricity demand. Enough to power the world for millions of years.
The problem was never whether it worked. It was getting to it.
Three miles of solid granite stood in the way. For decades, every attempt failed or cost too much.
Last year, a crew near the Grand Canyon punched through in 16 days. The Department of Energy had predicted 64.
That changed everything.
Google locked in a 15-year contract. Bill Gates wrote a $100 million check. The Pentagon made it their top priority.
On August 18th, Washington hands this energy source a regulatory edge no competitor receives.
One company has spent sixty years drilling toward this moment. They control the infrastructure from ground to grid.
What This Means for the Market
Real estate investors are starting to look more closely at the full cost of ownership.
In the past, many discussions focused on buying the right building in the right location.
That is still important.
But the next step is understanding how well that building can hold its income after costs rise.
A property with slightly lower rent growth but stable expenses may become more attractive than a property with stronger income but rising costs.
The best assets are not always the ones that earn the most today. They are often the ones that can keep working through changing conditions.
By the Numbers
Between 2019 and 2024, commercial property insurance premiums grew more than 15% per year on average, and by nearly 30% in 2023 alone, according to a Brookings Institution study of more than 100,000 multifamily properties. Insurance costs roughly doubled as a share of rental income over that five-year period. In the areas with the largest increases, net operating income fell by more than 25% over the past decade.
The Deloitte Center for Financial Services reported that the average monthly insurance cost for a U.S. commercial building rose from $1,558 in 2013 to $2,726 in 2023. Deloitte projects that figure could reach $4,890 by 2030, an increase of nearly 80%. For states with the greatest extreme weather risk, costs could nearly double to $6,062 per month.
Moody's Analytics found that commercial property insurance costs have grown at an average annual rate of 9.7% since 2017, well above the 2–3% annual increases that underwriters previously expected.
Bottom Line
Insurance is becoming a bigger part of real estate analysis. The value of a property is not only about what it earns. It is also about what it costs to protect and operate.
The next generation of investors will likely pay closer attention to expenses that were once treated as predictable. Insurance is moving from a small line item to a major part of the investment decision.
